BS EN IEC 62282-7-2:2021 – TC:2022 Edition
$258.95
Tracked Changes. Fuel cell technologies – Test methods. Single cell and stack performance tests for solid oxide fuel cells
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2022 | 114 |
IEC 62282-7-2:2021 applies to SOFC cell/stack assembly units, testing systems, instruments and measuring methods, and specifies test methods to test the performance of SOFC cells and stacks. This document is not applicable to small button cells that are designed for SOFC material testing and provide no practical means of fuel utilization measurement. This document is used based on the recommendation of the entity that provides the cell performance specification or for acquiring data on a cell or stack in order to estimate the performance of a system based on it. Users of this document can selectively execute test items suitable for their purposes from those described in this document. This first edition cancels and replaces IEC TS 62282-7-2 published in 2014. This edition includes the following significant technical changes with respect to IEC TS 622827-2:2014: – users can substitute selected test methods of this document with equivalent test methods of IEC 62282-8-101 for solid oxide cell (SOC) operation for energy storage purposes, operated in reverse or reversible mode; – terms and definitions are aligned with the corresponding terms and definitions in IEC 62282-8-101; – symbols are aligned with the corresponding symbols in IEC 62282-8-101.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
64 | undefined |
67 | Annex ZA(normative)Normative references to international publicationswith their corresponding European publications |
69 | CONTENTS |
71 | FOREWORD |
73 | INTRODUCTION |
74 | 1 Scope 2 Normative references |
75 | 3 Terms, definitions and symbols 3.1 Terms and definitions |
77 | 3.2 Symbols Table 1 – Symbols |
78 | 4 General safety conditions 5 Cell/stack assembly unit Tables |
79 | 6 Testing system 6.1 Subsystems in testing system 6.1.1 General 6.1.2 Anode gas control subsystem 6.1.3 Cathode gas control subsystem Figure 1 – Testing system |
80 | 6.1.4 Cell/stack assembly unit temperature control subsystem 6.1.5 Output power control subsystem 6.1.6 Measurement and data acquisition subsystem 6.1.7 Safety subsystem 6.1.8 Mechanical load control subsystem 6.1.9 Gas pressure control subsystem for anode and cathode 6.1.10 Test system control subsystem 6.2 Maximum variation in control items of testing system Figures |
81 | 7 Instruments and measurement methods 7.1 General 7.2 Instrument uncertainty 7.3 Anode gas 7.3.1 Anode gas flow rate |
82 | 7.3.2 Anode gas composition 7.3.3 Anode gas temperature |
83 | 7.3.4 Anode gas pressure 7.3.5 Anode exhaust gas flow rate 7.3.6 Anode exhaust gas component 7.3.7 Anode exhaust gas temperature 7.3.8 Anode exhaust gas pressure |
84 | 7.4 Cathode gas 7.4.1 Cathode gas flow rate 7.4.2 Cathode gas component 7.4.3 Cathode gas temperature 7.4.4 Cathode gas pressure 7.4.5 Cathode exhaust gas flow rate |
85 | 7.4.6 Cathode exhaust gas component 7.4.7 Cathode exhaust gas temperature 7.4.8 Cathode exhaust gas pressure 7.5 Output voltage 7.6 Output current 7.7 Cell/stack assembly unit temperature 7.8 Mechanical load 7.9 Total impedance |
86 | 7.10 Ambient conditions 8 Test preparation 8.1 General 8.2 Standard test conditions and test range |
87 | 8.3 Components and impurities of anode gas and cathode gas 8.4 Basis of the test procedure 8.5 Confirmation of aging conditions of unit 8.6 Confirmation of criteria of stable state 8.7 Data acquisition method 9 Test procedure 9.1 Set-up |
88 | 9.2 Initial conditioning 9.3 Shut-down 10 Performance test 10.1 Rated power test 10.1.1 Objective 10.1.2 Test method 10.1.3 Presentation of results |
89 | 10.2 Current-voltage characteristics test 10.2.1 Objective 10.2.2 Test method 10.2.3 Presentation of results |
90 | 10.3 Effective fuel utilization dependency test 10.3.1 Objective 10.3.2 Test method |
91 | 10.3.3 Presentation of results 10.4 Long term durability test 10.4.1 Objective 10.4.2 Test method |
92 | 10.4.3 Presentation of results 10.5 Thermal cycling durability test 10.5.1 Objective 10.5.2 Test method |
93 | 10.5.3 Presentation of results 10.6 Internal reforming performance test 10.6.1 Objective 10.6.2 Test method 10.6.3 Presentation of results |
94 | 10.7 Resistance components identification test 10.7.1 Objective 10.7.2 Test method 10.7.3 Presentation of results |
95 | 11 Test report 11.1 General 11.2 Report items Figure 2 – Typical diagram of complex impedance plot for SOFC |
96 | 11.3 Test unit data description 11.4 Test conditions description 11.5 Test data description 11.6 Uncertainty evaluation |
97 | Annexes Annex A (informative) Example of cell assembly unit Figure A.1 – Example of cell assembly unit |
98 | Annex B (informative) Calculation of effective fuel utilization B.1 General B.2 Calculation method |
99 | B.3 Calculation examples Table B.1 − nj for representative fuels Table B.2 − Anode gas composition, flow rate of each fuel component qj, and njqj |
101 | Annex C (informative) Calculation of effective oxygen utilization C.1 General C.2 Calculation method |
102 | C.3 Calculation example Table C.1 − Cathode gas composition, qO2, and Itheory |
103 | Annex D (informative) Maximum width of the voltage hysteresis in I‑V characteristics test Figure D.1 – Voltage hysteresis at a given sweep rate in I-V characteristics test |
104 | Annex E (informative) Current-voltage characteristics test under constant effective fuel utilization Figure E.1 – Example of the record in current-voltage characteristics test under constant effective fuel utilization |
105 | Annex F (informative) Test report (template) F.1 Overview F.2 General information F.3 Test unit data description |
106 | F.4 Test conditions F.5 Rated power test F.6 Current-voltage characteristics test |
107 | F.7 Effective fuel utilization dependency test |
108 | F.8 Long-term durability test |
109 | F.9 Thermal cycling durability test F.10 Internal reforming performance test |
110 | F.11 Resistance components identification test |
111 | Annex G (informative) Method for determining instrument uncertainty |
112 | Bibliography |