BSI PD ISO/IEC TS 11801-9903:2021
$198.66
Information technology. Generic cabling systems for customer premises – Matrix modelling of channels and links
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2021 | 52 |
This part of ISO/IEC 11801, which is a Technical Specification, establishes a matrix-model for formulating limits for mixed-mode parameters within and between two pairs of balanced cabling. This is for the purpose of supporting new, improved balanced cabling channel and link specifications.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
2 | undefined |
4 | CONTENTS |
7 | FOREWORD |
9 | INTRODUCTION Figures Figure 1 – Link configurations of ISO/IEC 11801-1 |
11 | 1 Scope 2 Normative references 3 Terms, definitions and abbreviated terms 3.1 Terms and definitions |
12 | 3.2 Symbols and abbreviated terms |
13 | 4 Matrix model 5 Matrix definition 5.1 General 5.2 Quadriports 5.3 Matrix port definition for a two-pair system representative for modelling purposes |
14 | 5.4 Operational scattering matrix 5.5 General naming convention Figure 2 – Matrix definition of a 4-port two twisted pair system Figure 3 – Operational scattering parameters example from port 2 Tables Table 1 – All four ports operational scattering parameter definition |
15 | 5.6 S-matrix 5.7 Passivity Table 2 – Equal S-parameters for real components |
16 | 5.8 Operational reflection loss matrix 5.9 Transmission matrix (T-matrix) 5.10 S-matrix of cabling Figure 4 – Transmission matrix concatenation showingan example of a 2-connector permanent link |
17 | 6 Calculation with matrices using limit lines 7 Extracting limit lines |
18 | 8 General case using mixed-mode matrices 8.1 General 8.2 M-parameters Figure 5 – Graphical example of a NEXT calculation showing statistical results (red) and final calculation (blue) Figure 6 – One pair M-matrix showing the submatrices |
19 | 9 Submatrix DD 9.1 General 9.2 Equations to extract the cabling limit lines 9.2.1 General 9.2.2 Operational attenuation 9.2.3 Near-end crosstalk 9.2.4 Attenuation to far-end crosstalk ratio |
20 | 9.2.5 Reflection (RL) 10 Component values to be used as input to the model 10.1 General |
21 | 10.2 Cable 10.2.1 General 10.2.2 Wave attenuation 10.2.3 Near-end crosstalk 10.2.4 Far-end crosstalk |
22 | 10.2.5 Reflection Figure 7 – 100 m cable return loss without reflection at both ends |
23 | 10.3 Connections 10.3.1 General 10.3.2 As a point source of disturbance 10.3.3 As a transmission line Figure 8 – 100 m cable return loss with a reflection of 0,03 at both ends(6 Ω mismatch, ~23 dB return loss at 1 MHz) |
24 | 11 Submatrices CC, CD and DC 11.1 General 11.2 Submatrix CD 11.3 Submatrix DC 11.4 Submatrix CC |
25 | Annex A (informative)Matrix conversion formulas A.1 Overview A.2 Formulas A.2.1 Mixed-mode to T-matrix A.2.2 T-matrix to M-matrix A.2.3 Conversion matrices |
26 | Figure A.1 – X matrices |
27 | Annex B (normative)Channel and permanent link models for balanced cabling B.1 General B.2 Insertion loss B.2.1 Insertion loss of the channel configuration |
28 | B.2.2 Insertion loss of the permanent link configurations B.2.3 Assumptions for insertion loss Table B.1 – Insertion loss deviation |
29 | B.3 NEXT B.3.1 NEXT of the channel configuration B.3.2 NEXT of the permanent link configurations |
30 | B.3.3 Assumptions for NEXT Figure B.1 – Example of computation of NEXT with higher precision |
33 | B.4 ACR-F B.4.1 ACR-F of the channel configuration B.4.2 ACR-F for the permanent link configurations |
34 | B.4.3 Assumptions for ACR-F B.5 No Return loss B.5.1 Return loss of the channel and permanent link configurations |
35 | B.5.2 Assumptions for the return loss circuit analysis method |
38 | B.6 PS ANEXT link modelling B.6.1 General B.6.2 PS ANEXT between connectors B.6.3 PS ANEXT between cable segments B.6.4 Principles of link modelling |
39 | B.7 PS AACR-F link modelling B.7.1 General B.7.2 PS AFEXT between connectors B.7.3 PS AACR-F between cable segments B.7.4 Principles of link modelling |
40 | B.7.5 Impact of PS AACR-F in channels and links with substantially different lengths Figure B.2 – Example of increased impact of PS AFEXT |
43 | B.8 Component assumptions for modelling purposes Table B.2 – Modelling assumptions for cable transmission parameters Table B.3 – Model input assumptions used in the statistical calculation (Class EA) |
44 | Table B.4 – Model input assumptions used in the statistical calculation (Class FA) |
45 | Annex C (informative)Terms and definitions C.1 Comparison of namings Table C.1 – Comparison of naming in ISO/IEC 11801-1 and ISO/IEC TS 11801-9903 |
46 | C.2 General C.3 Background of terms and definitions C.3.1 Operational attenuation |
47 | Figure C.1 – Defining the operational attenuation andthe operational transfer functions of a two-port |
48 | C.3.2 Operational transfer function (TB) C.3.3 Image or wave transfer function (T) C.3.4 Insertion transfer function of a two-port (TBI) C.3.5 Insertion transfer function (TBI) measured with a vector network analyser C.3.6 Operational reflection loss transfer function (Tref = Sref) of a junction |
49 | Figure C.2 – Defining the reflection transfer functionsand the return loss of a junction |
50 | Bibliography |